Brown & Carlson provides comprehensive workers’ compensation defense services, spanning litigation and alternative dispute resolution.
At the heart of Brown & Carlson is a workers’ compensation defense practice grounded in a deep commitment to passionately representing employers and insurers. With a focus on providing trusted counsel and guidance, our team relentlessly protects our clients’ interests.
We represent a diverse range of clients — including employers from small businesses to large self-insureds, insurers, and third-party administrators — handling all aspects of workers’ compensation defense, from claim investigation to litigation, settlement, and appeals.
Our industry experience covers a wide range of sectors, including healthcare, manufacturing, food distribution, staffing, delivery services, logistics, and more. With insight across industries, we tailor our representation to fit the particular circumstances of each case.
Brown & Carlson’s attorneys are respected leaders in workers’ compensation defense in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Employers and insurers routinely entrust the firm with their most challenging cases, drawing on our experience at every level of the state legal system—including appellate courts and the State Supreme Court—where we have handled notable workers’ compensation matters.
With a focus on close collaboration, responsiveness, and unmatched legal knowledge, the Brown & Carlson team is committed to delivering exceptional representation customized to each client.
In addition to representing clients in a wide range of disputes, several Brown & Carlson attorneys serve as mediators and arbitrators to help outside parties reach resolution. Mediation is a particular area of expertise at Brown & Carlson and the attorneys who take part recognize that every case—regardless of size or complexity—is important to those involved. They are also committed to providing efficient, cost-effective mediations that help involved parties avoid the expense and uncertainty of further litigation.
In the past, injuries occurring at employer-sponsored recreational programs and sponsored social events were most often viewed as not arising out of and in the course and scope of employment under Minnesota Statute 176.021, subd. 9, unless the employee was
The Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) recently decided the case of Nash v. Diocese of Duluth/St. Joseph’s Church and addressed two important issues: reasonableness and medical necessity of a dorsal root ganglion (DRG) implant trial and the continuation
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently held in Brunner v. Post Consumer Brands that an injured employee retains the right to assert a direct claim for medical expenses under the Workers’ Compensation Act—even where those expenses were initially paid by a